Mbachu Responds to Deji Adeyanju’s Remarks on Peter Obi:The Igbo Are Not Politically Tribalistic – They Support Competence Over Ethnicity
By Jude Evans Mbachu in Port Harcourt
The political consciousness of the Igbo people of Nigeria is often mischaracterized by those who fail to look beyond surface-level narratives. Contrary to claims of ethnic bias, the Igbo have consistently demonstrated a commitment to competence, integrity, and capacity over tribal considerations in their political choices.
Chief Jude Evans Mbachu in his points stated that in the 1993 presidential election, despite the fact that Bashir Tofa’s running mate, Dr. Sylvester Ugo, hailed from the South-East, the region voted overwhelmingly for Chief MKO Abiola. This critical decision reflected a clear preference for perceived competence and national appeal over ethnic sentiment.
Accordingly a similar pattern emerged in 2003 when revered Igbo leader Dim Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu ran for president under the APGA platform against incumbent President Olusegun Obasanjo. Once again, the South-East gave its support to Obasanjo, underscoring the region’s consistent prioritization of national interest and perceived capability over ethnic loyalty.
He stressed that, Even when Muhammadu Buhari fielded Igbo running mates in previous elections, he failed to secure a majority in the South-East. The evidence is clear: the Igbo electorate does not vote on the basis of ethnicity. Their voting behavior has, over time, reflected a pattern of support for credible, capable leaders — regardless of ethnic origin.
From Vice President Yemi Osinbajo to former governors like Babatunde Fashola and Rotimi Amaechi, and even Borno State’s Professor Babagana Zulum, the South-East has often shown admiration for competent leaders from other regions, preferring them to Igbo candidates considered less effective or unprincipled.
Mbachu succinctly stated that,
It is within this context that the popularity of Mr. Peter Obi should be understood. His wide acceptance across the Igbo nation — and indeed across Nigeria — is not an expression of ethnic loyalty but a reflection of his track record. As Governor of Anambra State, Obi distinguished himself through prudent fiscal management, transparency, and measurable development. His tenure earned both local and international recognition for good governance.
Peter Obi’s appeal cuts across ethnic and religious lines because it is rooted in integrity and visionary leadership. He has become a symbol of hope for millions, particularly among the youth, not because of his ancestry, but because of his character, competence, and clarity of purpose.
Those who attempt to diminish his standing with vitriolic rhetoric or unfounded allegations should ask themselves: What superior leadership model are they offering in return?
He condemned the actions of a known Activist Deji Adeyanju, in which he has recently made several critical remarks about Peter Obi, questioning his actions and intentions. While every citizen has the right to critique public figures, criticism must be constructive and grounded in fact.
During a Channels TV interview, Adeyanju questioned Obi’s absence from a campaign rally in Ekiti State. Yet it is worth asking: What strategic value would such a visit have brought in a state where the ruling party enjoys a deep political stronghold?
Unfortunately, Adeyanju’s commentary has increasingly come across as personal rather than principled — more driven by resentment than reason. Even his associate, fellow activist and presidential aspirant Omoyele Sowore, manages to engage in political critique without descending into hostility.
Deji Adeyanju is widely regarded as an intelligent voice in civil society. But to remain a credible contributor to national discourse, it is important he channels his energy toward presenting a compelling vision for the country, rather than launching ad hominem attacks on a man who continues to inspire many.
If Obi is not the ideal leader in his view, the task then is to propose and support better alternatives — not to tear down others without offering solutions.
Peter Obi has never claimed perfection. Like every public figure, he is open to scrutiny. However, his growing popularity is rooted in a reputation for good governance and a clear departure from the status quo. In a country plagued by corruption, insecurity, and economic instability, his message of accountability and reform resonates deeply.
Baseless attacks only serve to reinforce his credibility in the eyes of many Nigerians, who are increasingly weary of toxic politics. What Nigeria needs is a more constructive political dialogue — one grounded in ideas, not insults.
If critics like Deji Adeyanju have a better blueprint for Nigeria’s future, they are encouraged to present it boldly. Let the electorate decide. But if criticism continues to be shaped by personal animosity rather than national interest, history may not look kindly on such contributions to the public space.
